Interdependent critical infrastructures resilience: methodology and case study

Author:

Robert Benoît,Morabito Luciano,Cloutier Irène,Hémond Yannick

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a coherence analysis to evaluate the resilience for a critical infrastructure (CI). This is the new way to evaluate the CI and demonstrate that the authors need to pass from the protection towards resilience. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use two approaches for this research. First is a consequence-based approach to evaluate the resilience. This approach has been used many times for evaluating the interdependencies between CIs. The second is a systemic approach to characterize the system and doing the coherence analysis. Findings – This paper presents a methodology to evaluate the coherence in a context of CIs protection. The coherence analysis in resilience is a new concept and the first result to the application seems very good for the user of the research. Originality/value – The originality of this paper is the coherence analysis applied to a resilience evaluation. The criteria for coherence analysis is innovative and it is a new way to consider the resilience and the relation between an organization and it is partners. Another value is the need for a wider scope in the analysis of hazards and how to address them that includes the infrastructure system itself, but also other related organizations and infrastructure systems.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health (social science)

Reference11 articles.

1. Di Mauro, C. , Bouchon, S. , Logtmeijer, C. , Pride, R.D. , Hartung, T. and Nordvik, J.P. (2010), “A structured approach to identifying European critical infrastructures”, International Journal of Critical Infrastructures , Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 277-292.

2. Hemond, Y. and Robert, B. (2013), “Assessment process of the resilience potential of critical infrastructures”, International Journal of Critical Infrastructures , Vol. 10 Nos 3-4, pp. 200-217.

3. Hollnagel, E. (Ed.) (2011), “Epilogue: RAG – the resilience analysis grid”, Resilience Engineering in Practice – A Guidebook , Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 275-296.

4. O’Rourke, T.D. (2007), “Critical infrastructure, interdependencies and resilience”, The Bridge , Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 22-29.

5. Petit, F. , Buehring, W.A. , Whitfield, R. , Fisher, R.E. and Collins, M.J. (2011), “Protective measures and vulnerability indices for enhanced critical infrastructure protection programme”, International Journal of Critical Infrastructures , Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 1-20.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3