Abstract
PurposeDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, the public relied heavily on digital media to stay tuned for the latest update. Media preference could increase risk perceptions, although the influence of diverse media exposure remains unknown. Based on protection motivation theory, this study aims to investigate how digital media exposure diversity and information verification influence vaccination intention.Design/methodology/approachAnalyzing survey data from 837 respondents in China, this study examined the effects of digital media exposure on information verification, including their influences on the threat appraisal, coping appraisal, vaccine misinformation beliefs, subjective norms and trust in vaccines.FindingsResults indicate that diversity of digital media exposure increased threat appraisal (perceived severity) and coping appraisal (response efficacy and self-efficacy), while information verification increased only coping appraisal (response efficacy and self-efficacy). In addition, diversity of digital media exposure decreased vaccine misinformation beliefs. Furthermore, digital media exposure and information verification were linked to vaccination intention via the mediations of response efficacy, subjective norms and trust in vaccines.Originality/valueThis study is the first of its kind to investigate media exposure diversity in the context of vaccination and health crises. Our findings extended the PMT framework by exploring proactive information-related behaviors as antecedents of mediation processes. In addition, we examined misinformation beliefs, social norms and trust as societal influences. Theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.
Reference92 articles.
1. ‘To get or not to get vaccinated against COVID-19': Saudi women, vaccine hesitancy, and framing effects;Discourse and Communication,2021
2. Social distancing intentions to reduce the spread of COVID-19: the extended theory of planned behavior;Wilopo;BMC Public Health,2021
3. The theory of planned behavior;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991
4. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (2004), “The influence of attitudes on behavior”, in Albarracin, D., Johnson, B.T. and Zanna, M.P. (Eds), The Handbook of Attitudes, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 173-222.