A collective artefact design of decision support systems: design science research perspective
Author:
J. Miah Shah,Kerr Don,von Hellens Liisa
Abstract
Purpose
– The knowledge of artefact design in design science research can have an important application in the improvement of decision support systems (DSS) development research. Recent DSS literature has identified a significant need to develop user-centric DSS method for greater relevance with respect to context of use. The purpose of this paper is to develop a collective DSS design artefact as method in a practical industry context.
Design/methodology/approach
– Under the influence of goal-directed interaction design principles the study outlines the innovative DSS artefact based on design science methodology to deliver a cutting-edge decision support solution, which provides user-centric provisions through the use of design environment and ontology techniques.
Findings
– The DSS artefact as collective information technology applications through the application of design science knowledge can effectively be designed to meet decision makers’ contextual needs in an agricultural industry context.
Research limitations/implications
– The study has limitations in that it was developed in a case study context and remains to be fully tested in a real business context. It is also assumed that the domain decisions can be parameterised and represented using a constraint programming language.
Practical implications
– The paper concludes that the DSS artefact design and this development successfully overcomes some of the limitations of traditional DSS such as low-user uptake, system obsolescence, low returns on investment and a requirement for continual re-engineering effort.
Social implications
– The design artefact has the potential of increasing user uptake in an industry that has had relevancy problems with past DSS implementation and has experienced associated poor uptake.
Originality/value
– The design science paradigm provides structural guidance throughout the defined process, helping ensure fidelity both to best industry knowledge and to changing user contexts.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems
Reference52 articles.
1. Arnott, D.
(2006), “Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: a design science approach”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 55-78. 2. Arnott, D.
and
Dodson, G.
(2008), “Decision support systems failure”, in
Burstein, F.
and
Holsapple, C.W.
(Eds), Handbook on Decision Support Systems, Vol. 1, Springer, Berlin, pp. 763-790. 3. Arnott, D.
and
Pervan, G.
(2008), “Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 657-672. 4. Arnott, D.
and
Pervan, G.
(2012), “Design science in decision support systems research: an assessment using the Hevner, March, Park, and Ram guidelines”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 13 No. 11, pp. 923-949. 5. Baskerville, R.
(2008), “What design is not”, in
Hart, D.N.
and
Gregor, S.D.
(Eds), The Keynote, The 4th Biennial ANU Workshop-Information Systems Foundations: The Role of Design Science, Australian National University, 2-3 October, Canberra, p. -.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|