Bridging the data divide between practitioners and academics

Author:

Benoit SabineORCID,Klose Sonja,Wirtz Jochen,Andreassen Tor Wallin,Keiningham Timothy L.

Abstract

Purpose Organizations (data gatherers in the context) drown in data while at the same time seeking managerially relevant insights. Academics (data hunters) have to deal with decreasing respondent participation and escalating costs of data collection while at the same time seeking to increase the managerial relevance of their research. The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework on how, managers and academics can collaborate better to leverage each other’s resources. Design/methodology/approach This research synthesizes the academic and the managerial literature on the realities and priorities of practitioners and academics with regard to data. Based on the literature, reflections from the world’s leading service research centers, and the authors’ own experiences, the authors develop recommendations on how to collaborate in research. Findings Four dimensions of different data realities and priorities were identified: research problem, research resources, research process and research outcome. In total, 26 recommendations are presented that aim to equip academics to leverage the potential of corporate data for research purposes and to help managers to leverage research results for their business. Research limitations/implications This paper argues that both practitioners and academics have a lot to gain from collaborating by exchanging corporate data for scientific approaches and insights. However, the gap between different realities and priorities needs to be bridged when doing so. The paper first identifies data realities and priorities and then develops recommendations on how to best collaborate given these differences. Practical implications This research has the potential to contribute to managerial practice by informing academics on how to better collaborate with the managerial world and thereby facilitate collaboration and the dissemination of academic research for the benefit of both parties. Originality/value Whereas the previous literature has primarily examined practitioner–academic collaboration in general, this study is the first to focus specifically on the aspects related to sharing corporate data and to elaborate on academic and corporate objectives with regard to data and insights.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference81 articles.

1. Big data, data science, and analytics: the opportunity and challenge for IS research;Information Systems Research,2014

2. Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research;Journal of Management Studies,2013

3. Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: a case of cross-profession collaboration;Academy of Management Journal,2001

4. The practitioner-researcher divide in Industrial, work and organizational (IWO) psychology: where are we now, and where do we go from here?;Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,2001

5. Bridging scholarship in management: epistemological reflections;British Journal of Management,2003

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Managerial relevance of moderating and mediating variables/effects in management research;Management Decision;2024-06-04

2. Tourism Growth and Economic Development;Tourism;2024-05-13

3. A Design Framework for Reflective Play;Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-11

4. Corporate index: bridging the academic–practitioner gap;Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education;2024-01-26

5. “Doubting with”: An opportunity to renew the debate on researcher–practitioner collaboration;European Management Review;2023-09-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3