Author:
Parida Aditya,Chattopadhyay Gopi
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to develop a multi‐criteria hierarchical maintenance performance measurement framework, which is balanced, holistic and integrated to various levels of the organization.Design/methodology/approachConsolidation of published research and current practices are combined to study, identify and develop this proposed framework.FindingsA framework for maintenance performance measurement is proposed for developing and implementing a relevant, timely, reliable, cost and time‐effective and user‐friendly system for stakeholders at various levels. The indicators at the subsystem/component level, plant level and corporate level are linked with the MPIs for the organizational objectives and strategy.Practical implicationsManagement of maintenance performance is critical for long term economic viability of business and industry. Development of an integrated, balanced and holistic MPM system needs to consider various issues to measure the contribution of maintenance towards total business goals. In this paper, a multi‐criteria hierarchical MPM framework has been developed. This framework can be used by the operating managers for their maintenance decisions at various levels of an organization.Originality/valueThe paper presents a proposed MPM framework, which is integrated, and focuses on both internal and external effectiveness.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference59 articles.
1. Abran, A. and Buglione, L. (2003), “A multidimensional performance model for consolidating balanced scorecards”, Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 34, pp. 339‐49.
2. Ahlmann, H. (2002), “From traditional practice to the new understanding: the significance of life cycle profit concept in the management of industrial enterprises”, Proceedings of the International Foundation for Research in Maintenance Management and Modelling, Växjö, 6‐7 May.
3. Allander, H. (1997), “Objectives matrix provides information balance”, Water Engineering & Management, Vol. 144 No. 9, pp. 30‐1.
4. Al‐Turki, U. and Duffuaa, S. (2003), “Performance measures for academic departments”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 17 No. 7, pp. 330‐8.
5. Augusto, M., Figueira, J. and Lisboa, J. (2005), “An application of a multi‐criteria approach to assessing the performance of Portugal's economic sectors”, European Business Review, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 113‐32.
Cited by
117 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献