Oil pipeline spill cause analysis

Author:

Bertolini Massimo,Bevilacqua Maurizio

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop an easy and robust tool to develop a decision support system (DSS) for the inspection staff of oil pipelines. The aim is to predict “the class” of each spillage, with respect to some relevant variables such as, mechanical failure or system malfunction. The management will then be able to define which pipelines to monitor and to choose the most suitable monitoring policies, based on the decision tree analysis outcome.Design/methodology/approachA non‐parametric technique based on rule induction is proposed for the identification of the expected spill cause category of cross‐country oil pipelines. In particular, the classification and regression trees approach is used to automatically generate inspection or maintenance decision rules. The analysis that is described is based on an extended database concerning information about spill cause category in cross‐country oil pipelines in Western Europe.FindingsThe proposed technique represents an interesting added value tool for the management. The proposed methodology extrapolates rules for determining the expected spill cause category of cross‐country pipelines, depending on the boundary conditions.Practical implicationsThe methodology here presented will assist maintenance managers of oil pipeline to better plan maintenance activity. In particular, the procedure makes it possible to determine which parts of a pipeline have to be submitted to a monitoring action or particular protection, with the aim of improving the efficiency and reducing the risk of spillages.Originality/valueEffective planning, coordination, and scheduling of the maintenance function can be, and for many years was, accomplished without computer support. The proposed procedure may be included in an information systems tool (sound Computerized Maintenance Information Management System (CMMIS)), for more efficient and effective maintenance/inspection scheduling activities.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Reference19 articles.

1. Answer TreeTM 3.0 (2001), User Guide, SPSS Inc, Ireland.

2. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R. and Stone, C.J. (1984), Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, CA.

3. California State Fire Marshal (1990), Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Risk Assessment, Office of State Fire Marshall, Sacramento, CA.

4. CONCAWE (2002), Western European Cross‐country Oil Pipelines 30‐year Performance Statistics, CONCAWE, Brussels.

5. Dey, P.K. (2002), “An integrated assessment model for cross‐country pipelines”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, No. 22, pp. 703‐21.

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3