Corporate sustainability: accounting standards vs tax by design

Author:

Russell David

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the contradiction between sustainability and accounting practices, underpinned by reporting standards and question whether financial statements prepared in this way represent a true and fair view? The paper highlights the disregard for externalities as a fundamental obstacle to sustainable reporting and proposes taxation designs to recognise the costs associated with externalities as the basis for equitable reporting, pricing and sustainable business practices. Design/methodology/approach – The approach taken uses Smith’s (1776) tenets of a good tax, to consider characteristics of taxation that may be harnessed for financial reporting, valuation, economic substance and legal form. Findings – The findings reveal a case for further examination of the efficacy of taxation, alongside a full-cost accounting approach, to benefit sustainable reporting. Research limitations/implications – The implications of the research are a possible whole reappraisal of costs and prices to recognise the sustainability dimension and place it at the heart of the corporate agenda. The limitations arise from contestable valuation of sustainable matters, arising from a lack of an agreed theoretical framework. Originality/value – The paper proposes a realignment of costs and prices to correct market imperfection through the innovative application of taxation, but without a fundamental reappraisal of the economic status quo upon which Western-style capitalism is underpinned.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference58 articles.

1. Albareda, L. , Lozano, M. and Ysa, T. (2007), “Public policies on corporate social responsibility: the role of governments”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 74 No. 4, pp. 391-407.

2. Aras, G. and Crowther, D. (2011), “No accounting for inequity: accounting’s opposition to sustainability”, paper presented at BAFA Annual Conference, Aston Business School, Birmingham, 12-14 April.

3. Barth, R. and Wolff, F. (2009), “Corporate social responsibility and sustainability impact: opening up the arena”, in Barth, , R. , Wolff, and F. (Eds), Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe Rhetoric and Realities, Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA.

4. Bebbington, J. and Gray, R. (2001), “An account of sustainability: failure, success and reconceptualisation”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 557-587.

5. Bebbington, J. and Thomson, I. (1996), “Business conceptions of sustainability and the implications for accountancy”, ACCA Research Report No. 48, Association of Certified Accountants, London.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3