Whose voice is heard? The complexities of power when conducting research with children using visual and arts-informed methods

Author:

Robb AnnaORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis article examines the power relationships between researcher and participants, children and adults, drawing on the theories of transgressions and resistance in power, during a research project concerning children's experiences of the visual arts.Design/methodology/approachData were gathered conducted in two Scottish primary schools by employing visual and arts-based methods, and the article discusses the role they played in revealing acts of power between participants as well as providing insight of a child's world.FindingsThe article concludes by emphasising how these methods revealed a network of power acts which supported children to transgress, resist and reveal their world to the adult.Research limitations/implicationsThe role of reflexion on the part of the researcher is key when undertaking research adopting participatory methods such as visual methods.Originality/valueThe article contributes to the ongoing discussions concerning visual methods research and their use in participatory research, and illustrates the complexities of power in this field.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Social Sciences,Education

Reference37 articles.

1. Allan, J. (2013), “Foucault and his acolytes: discourse, power and ethics”, in Murphy, M. (Ed.), Social Theory and Education Research, Routledge, Abingdon.

2. Speaking the unspeakable in forbidden places: addressing lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality in the primary school;Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning,2008

3. Bragg, S. and Buckingham, D. (2008), “'Scrapbooks' as a resource in media research with young people”, in Thomson, P. (Ed.), Doing Visual Research with Children and Young People, Routledge, London.

4. Using photography and art in concept mapping research with adults with dyslexia;Disability and Society,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3