Abstract
PurposeIntersectionality addresses complex avenues of oppression that emanate at the intersections of one’s identities. However, the intersectional framework assumes static identities, which are increasingly being acknowledged for their fluidity. This research explored the extent of the fluidity of social identities to draw implications for the application of the framework in research.Design/methodology/approach27 participants from a post-graduate elective course on diversity and inclusion identified their significant social identities, and submitted a write-up using hermeneutic phenomenology in which the participants shared their lived experiences of the fluidity of their social identities in different spaces they occupy or find themselves in.FindingsFluidity-triggering stimuli in different environments and their associations with identity-related motives were uncovered using thematic analysis. Stimuli operating at micro-, meso- and macro-levels rationally explained identity fluidity. However, in addition to types, intensity and frequency of stimuli, psychological factors, such as identity status, were decisive in determining the degree of generalization of stimuli across individuals and spaces that significantly influenced identity fluidity.Originality/valueThis research explored the extent of the fluidity of social identities to draw implications for the application of the intersectional framework in research. The findings contribute to future research by identifying limitations of the intersectional framework based on the fluidity of social identities arising from environmental stimuli that operate at micro-, meso- and macro-levels, and the extent of psychological generalization of these stimuli across spaces.
Reference75 articles.
1. Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination;European Journal of Social Psychology,1988
2. Using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate how experienced practitioners learn to communicate clinical reasoning;The Qualitative Report,2007
3. Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the social sciences;Current Sociology,2003
4. April, K., Dharani, B. and April, A. (2022), “Lived experiences of exclusion: the psychological and behavioural effects”, in Ozbilgin, M.F. (Ed.), International Perspectives on Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, Emerald Publishing, Vol. 7.
5. Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties;The American Psychologist,2000