Patient value co-creation in online health communities

Author:

Zhao Jing,Wang Tao,Fan Xiucheng

Abstract

Purpose – Patient value co-creation represents a key research priority and an essential determinant of health care service outcomes. Yet few studies empirically examine the factors that motivate patients to participate actively in value co-creation. The purpose of this paper is to seek to identify the motivators of such activities in online health communities (OHC) and examine their specific and unique effects. Design/methodology/approach – A netnographic study helps identify the motivators that drive patients’ value co-creation activities in OHCs. The combination of these results with social identity theories suggest the hypotheses; mediation analyses test the hypothesized model with data collected from eight OHCs that address both life-threatening and non-life-threatening illnesses. Findings – The netnographic results show that social identity drives patients’ value co-creation activities. Interactions among OHC members and the cognitive resources of the OHC both contribute to the development of its social identity. Furthermore, benevolence trust, shared vision, and shared language determine how likely an OHC member is to identify with a particular OHC, which further influences his or her value co-creation activities in that OHC. Originality/value – Although value co-creation is critical to the health care sector, few studies examine antecedents of patient value co-creation empirically. This study represents an initial attempt to do so by combining innovative netnographic analyses with mediation analyses.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference72 articles.

1. Ashcroft, J.J. , Leinster, J.S. and Slade, D.P. (1986), “Mastectomy vs breast conservation: psychological effects of patient choice of treatment”, in Watson, M. and Creer, S. (Eds), Psychological Issues in Malignant Disease , Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 55-71.

2. Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989), “Social identity theory and the organization”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 20-39.

3. Badcott, D. (2005), “The expert patient: valid recognition or false hope?”, Medicine, Health Care Philosophy , Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 173-178.

4. Blau, P. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life , Wiley, New York, NY.

5. Brewer, B.M. (1991), “The social self: on being the same and different at the same time”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 475-482.

Cited by 117 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3