Abstract
PurposeThis paper explores how INGOs communicate their activities and achievements. In doing so, the study seeks to increase our understanding of INGOs' accountability practices.Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses thematic analysis to analyse 90 ‘leaders’ letters' (the letters that many charities include at the beginning of their Annual Reports and Accounts), published by 39 INGOs between 2015 and 2018.FindingsThis paper argues that within the Annual Report letters under consideration, INGOs' accountability practices focus on quantitative, process-driven, output reporting. In doing so, it is the actions and agency of INGOs that are primarily emphasised. INGO constituents are largely excluded from representation. Donors are presented only as contributors of financial capital. Drawing on field theory, the paper argues that this representational practice means INGO constituents are almost irrelevant to INGOs' representational and accountability communication practices.Originality/valueThis paper is indebted to previous important work and, building on such scholarship, seeks to contribute to the ongoing conversation about INGO accountability. While reinforcing some prior knowledge, the findings here also differ in the understanding of how donors are portrayed. The paper extends previous analyses by using field theory to show that the INGO field as considered here is a space in which representations of accountability are based on organisational and transactional factors, and does not value the humanity of INGOs' constituents. This connects to operations of power, between donors, INGOs, and constituents, and reinforces inequitable power within the development system.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference147 articles.
1. Just let us be: domination, the postcolonial condition and the global field of business schools;Academy of Management Learning and Education,2019
2. NGO accountability: retrospective and prospective academic contributions;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2019
3. Ainsworth, D. (2015), Financial Times attacks ‘highly inefficient’ charity sector and calls for government to force charities to merge, available at: https://www.civilsociety.co.uk/news/financial-times-attacks-highly--inefficient--charity-sector-and-calls-for-government-to-force-charities-to-merge.html (accessed 21 March 2022).
4. Apthorpe, R. (2013), “Coda: with Alice in Aidland: a seriously satirical allegory”, in Mosse, D. (Ed.), Adventures in Aidland. The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development, New York: Berghahn, pp. 199-220.
5. Four criteria of development NGO legitimacy;World Development,1999