Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to focus on two internal organizational factors in college football teams (team powerfulness and team reputation) and their combined relationship on game attendance. Authors aim to validate new data published by Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and NCAA websites; and to develop a new conceptual model to examine the interaction effect of team powerfulness and team reputation on game attendance.
Design/methodology/approach
This study relies on secondary data collected from the WSJ’s “College Football’s Grid of Shame” publication and the NCAA official website. Data for 123 US college football teams are collected representing 13 conferences for seasons 2010–2014. Multi-level regressions are utilized for statistical analyses.
Findings
Results reveal that not only team’s powerfulness is required for more public attendance to games, but also team reputation strengthens this relationship. In other words, team reputation plays an important role in increasing games’ attendance. Team reputation alone does not bring more attendees to games.
Originality/value
This paper studies the relevance of team reputation in the field of sports management. This paper argues that in order to achieve superior financial benefits in college football games, it is important to properly manage team powerfulness and its legal and ethical behavior. In this way, a positive reputation can leverage game attendance to a larger extent.
Subject
Marketing,Finance,Business and International Management
Reference72 articles.
1. Dimensions of brand personality;Journal of Marketing Research,1997
2. Fourth down and gold to go? Assessing the link between athletics and alumni giving;Social Science Quarterly,1996
3. The loyalty of German soccer fans: does a team’s brand image matter?;International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship,2005
4. Exploring the relationship between involvement, fan attraction, psychological commitment and behavioural loyalty in a sports spectator context;International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship,2010
5. Telecast deregulation and competitive balance;American Journal of Economics and Sociology,1995
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献