Learning styles preferences of statistics students

Author:

Yousef Darwish Abdulrahman

Abstract

Purpose – Although there are many studies addressing the learning styles of business students as well as students of other disciplines, there are few studies which address the learning style preferences of statistics students. The purpose of this study is to explore the learning style preferences of statistics students at a United Arab Emirates University (UAEU). Furthermore, it investigates whether there are statistically significant differences along the four dimensions of learning styles due to students’ demographic and academic characteristics. Design/methodology/approach – Questionnaires were distributed to the whole population which included 79 undergraduate statistics students at the UAEU, of which 69 returned the questionnaire. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages were used to present the main characteristics of respondents and the results of the study. Additionally, a chi-square test was used to find out if there were significant differences along the four dimensions of learning style preferences due to students’ demographic and academic characteristics. Findings – The results indicate that UAEU undergraduate statistics students have balanced preferences along the four dimensions of learning styles. Results also suggest that there are no statistically significant differences along the four dimensions of learning styles due to students’ demographic and academic characteristics, except in the active-reflective and sensing-intuitive dimensions with respect to high school type (private vs public). Research limitations/implications – There are a number of limitations associated with this study. First, the findings of the study are based on data from only one university. Second, the sample was small and limited to undergraduate statistics students and, therefore, it excluded graduate students who might have had different experiences. Third, the results are based on a self-reported questionnaire and this, in turn, might have affected the reliability of the results On the other hand, it has a number of implications for educators and students. Educators will benefit from the results of this study in the sense that they will adopt teaching styles and strategies that match learning styles of the majority of their students. Students themselves will benefit from knowing their own learning style. Originality/value – The present study is the first attempt to explore learning styles preference of undergraduate students not only in the UAE setting but also in the developing country setting.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education

Reference52 articles.

1. Abidin, M.J.Z. , Rezaee, A.A. , Abdullah, H.N. and Singh, K.K.B. (2011), “Learning styles and overall academic achievement in a specific educational system”, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science , Vol. 1 No. 10, pp. 143-152.

2. Al BuAli, W.H. , Balaha, M.H. and Al Muhaidab, N.S. (2013), “Assessment of learning style in a sample of Saudi medical students”, Acta Informatica Medica , Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 83-88.

3. Bargar, J.R. , Bargar, R.R. and Cano, J. (1994), Discovering Learning Preferences and Learning Differences in the Classroom , The Ohio Agricultural Education Curriculum Materials Service, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

4. Bell, J.A. (1998), “Problems in statistics: learning style, age, and part time students”, Education , Vol. 118 No. 4, pp. 526-528.

5. Cano, J. (1999), “The relationship between learning style, academic major, and academic performance of college students”, Journal of Agricultural Education , Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 30-37.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Learning Style Preferences of Business Students in Saudi Arabia;Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development;2024-07-12

2. Does Online Learning Differentiate Learning Styles of Turkish Teacher Candidates?;Handbook of Research on Advancing Teaching and Teacher Education in the Context of a Virtual Age;2022-11-04

3. Technophobia: How Students’ Technophobia Impacts Their Technology Acceptance in an Online Class;International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction;2022-06-12

4. Ensino e Aprendizagem Remotos: Lacunas no Campo da Administração no Contexto da Pandemia de COVID-19;Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa;2022-06-09

5. Identification and Learning Styles' Variation Factors for a Hybrid and Distance Learning Professional Training ODL-SPOC;International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET);2021-09-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3