Abstract
PurposeFrom a methodological point of view, life cycle costing (LCC) is well developed with respect to conventional costs. However, when it comes to costs related to environmental issues, neither the items nor their estimation have been well developed. This paper aims at investigating the possibilities of using life cycle assessment (LCA) results to identify and estimate environmental costs or benefits in an LCC.Design/methodology/approachThe paper begins by looking at the driving forces for introducing environmental costs in companies, continues by identifying external and internal environmental cost issues, and concludes with an attempt to estimate the internal costs.FindingsSome of the items of an LCC have to do with increased/decreased sales, others with good will. Both are difficult to estimate, but LCA or LCA‐like investigations may be helpful in identifying relevant issues. Future costs to the product system may also be estimated, for example, with a distance‐to‐target type of weighting. LCA may be helpful in roughly estimating risks, especially together with those LCA impact assessment methods that model damage. Such an item in LCC can be dealt with as an insurance fee or, if the risk is too high, as a way of including necessary preventive actions.Research limitations/implicationsThe literature on the subject is limited and not sufficient to aid in estimation of environmental costs and benefits for a company. It seems reasonable to begin an improvement of the methodology by looking at future costs and benefits.Practical implicationsThis paper may help in structuring the task of using LCA information for estimating environmental costs in LCC.Originality/valueThere has been increased interest recently in the integration of LCA and LCC, such as in the SETAC (Society for Ecotoxicology and Chemistry) working group on LCC. This paper contributes with new outlooks and structures for that work.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference18 articles.
1. Azar, C. and Sterner, T. (1996), “Discounting and distributional considerations in the context of global warming”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 169‐85.
2. Baumann, H. (1998), “Life cycle assessment and decision making”, PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.
3. DANTES (2003), available at: www.dantes.info/.
4. Dell'Isola, A.J. and Kirk, S.J. (1981), Life Cycle Costing for Design Professionals, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.
5. Environmental Product Declarations (2003), available at: www.environdec.com/.
Cited by
49 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献