Author:
Julien Heidi,Genuis Shelagh K.
Abstract
PurposeLibrary staff are experiencing increased work role complexity as they move from being service providers towards greater instructional roles, providing bibliographic instruction, user education, and information literacy instruction. The purpose of this paper is to explore how library staff relate to their instructional roles and the implications of those self‐understandings for instructional outcomes.Design/methodology/approachData collected from qualitative interviews with library staff in Canadian academic and public libraries and diary entries written over a three‐month period were analyzed using NVivo software and an open‐coding, grounded‐theory approach. The study took a phenomenological perspective and was influenced by constructivist sociological role theory.FindingsData analysis revealed the central place of affect in the experiences of librarians engaged in instructional work, and brought focus to the relational aspects of this work and the affective impact of visibility/invisibility of instructional outcomes. A prominent theme was the expression of “emotional labour”; participants used a variety of methods to manage this occupational stressor as they experienced it within the context of instructional work.Practical implicationsIndividuals and organizations will benefit from considering the influence of affect on library staff. Those who educate librarians should seek to improve understanding of affect and its impact on instruction; organizations will benefit from addressing the emotional labour performed as a part of the teaching role.Originality/valueThe study draws attention to the affective experiences of library staff. This is the first research article in the LIS literature to explore emotional labour as it relates to librarians.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference37 articles.
1. Arbuckle, K. (2008), “Emotion and knowledge: partners in library service?”, Feliciter, Vol. 54 No. 5, pp. 219‐21.
2. Association of College and Research Libraries (2000), “Information literacy competency standards for higher education”, available at: www.ftrf.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/standards.pdf (accessed 7 November 2008).
3. Bellas, M.A. (1999), “Emotional labor in academia: the case of professors”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 561 No. 1, pp. 96‐110.
4. Budd, J. (2005), “Phenomenology and information studies”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 61 No. 2, pp. 44‐59.
5. Callero, P.L. (2003), “The sociology of the self”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 29, pp. 115‐33.
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献