Open access in context: a user study

Author:

Nicholas David,Huntington Paul,Jamali Hamid R.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this research is to examine the impact on usage of the journal Nucleic Acids Research (NAR) moving to an open access model. A major objective was to examine the impact of open access in the context of other initiatives that have improved accessibility to scholarly journals. The study also aims to demonstrate the potential of deep log analysis for monitoring change in usage over time.Design/methodology/approachData were gathered from the logs for the period 2003‐June 2005 and analysed using deep log methods. The data were analysed to provide the following information on use: type of item viewed; usage over time; usage for individual journal issues; usage per type of article; age of article. Usage analyses were further examined with regard to the following user characteristics: subscriber/non‐subscriber; referrer link employed, organisational affiliation; geographical location.FindingsThe analysis showed that the rise in use of NAR over the survey period (140 per cent) could largely be attributed to the opening up of the site to search engines and that the move to OA had a relatively small influence on driving usage up further (less than 10 per cent).Originality/valueThe study for the first time thoroughly analyses the usage data of a significant experimental open access journal and reveals the huge impact of search engines on driving up usage.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference18 articles.

1. Antelman, K. (2004), “Do open access articles have a greater research impact?”, College & Research Libraries, Vol. 65 No. 1, pp. 372‐82.

2. Brody, T., Stamerjohanns, H., Harnad, S., Gingras, Y., Vallieres, F. and Oppenheim, C. (2004), “The effect of open access on citation impact“, paper presented at National Policies on Open Access (OA) Provision for University Research Output: an International meeting, Southampton University, Southampton, 19 February 2004, available at: http://opcit.eprints.org/feb19oa/brody‐impact.pdf (accessed 29 August 2006).

3. Creaser, C. (2006), “Evaluation of open access journal experiment: stage 2 interim data”, Assessing the Impact of Open Access, Preliminary Findings from Oxford Journals, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

4. Eysenbach, G. (2006), “Citation advantage of open access articles”, PLoS Biology, Vol. 4 No. 5, e157 (accessed 1 September 2006).

5. Harnad, S. and Brody, T. (2004), “Comparing the impact of Open Access (OA) vs non‐OA articles in the same journals”, D‐Lib Magazine, Vol. 10 No. 6, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html (accessed 1 September 2006).

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Massive Open Online Courses and Integrating Open Source Technology and Open Access Literature Into Technology-Based Degrees;Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition;2018

2. On the Road to Unrestricted Access to Scientific Information: The Open Access Movement;Scientific Scholarly Communication;2017

3. Open access awareness, use, and perception: a case study of AAU faculty members;New Library World;2015-01-12

4. The impact of free access to the scientific literature: a review of recent research;Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA;2011-07

5. Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas;Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology;2011-05-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3