Students' search process and outcome in Medline in writing an essay for a class on evidence‐based medicine

Author:

Huuskonen Saila,Vakkari Pertti

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this study is to explore to which extent searching by medical students in Medline produces information items useful for writing an essay measured by precision and relative recall as perceived by the students, the proportion of cited items, and their utilization on four dimensions of the essay writing task evaluated by external assessors. It also aims to study interrelations of search process and outcome.Design/methodology/approachThe study subjects were 42 third year medical students attending a class on Diagnostic and therapy. Searching in Medline was a part of their assignment of essay writing. The data consist of students' printed logs of Medline searches, students' assessments of the usefulness of the references retrieved, a questionnaire concerning the search process, and evaluation scores of the essays given by the teachers of the class. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for answering the research questions.FindingsThe paper finds that precision and relative recall were not associated with evaluation scores in three of the four dimensions assessed. Some of the process variables were associated with precision and with assessment scores in two of the four dimensions assessed. Citing rate was negatively associated with recall. It seems that precision and recall are only weakly, if at all, associated to the use of information in the documents retrieved for writing the essay. Precision and relative recall are not associated to the way information in the retrieved items is used for performing the task. Users evidently look for a sufficient number of documents containing enough information for progressing in their task. Precision and recall are not sufficient measures in evaluating IR systems, but they have to be completed by other measures indicating the impact of the system on users’ task performance.Originality/valueThe paper provides useful information on students' information search process.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference22 articles.

1. Bates, M.J. (1979), “Information search tactics”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 205‐14.

2. Black, T.R. (1999), Doing Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences an Integrated Approach to Research Design, Measurement and Statistics, Sage, London.

3. Borlund, P. (2000), Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval Systems, Åbo Akademi University Press, Åbo.

4. de Bliek, R., Friedman, C.P., Wildemuth, B.M., Martz, J.M., Twarog, R.G. and File, D. (1994), “Information retrieved from a database and the augmentation of personal knowledge”, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 328‐38.

5. Fidel, R. (1985), “Moves in online searching”, Online Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 61‐74.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An overview of semantic search evaluation initiatives;Journal of Web Semantics;2015-01

2. Search effort degrades search output but improves task outcome;Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology;2012-01-17

3. IR research;ACM SIGIR Forum;2012-01-09

4. Electronic Resources at the University of Sharjah Medical Library: An Investigation of Students' Information-Seeking Behavior;Medical Reference Services Quarterly;2010-10-29

5. Explaining User Performance in Information Retrieval: Challenges to IR Evaluation;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3