Abstract
The technological revolution is affecting the structure, form and content of documents, reducing the effectiveness of traditional abstracts that, to some extent, are inadequate to the new documentary conditions. Aims to show the directions in which abstracting/abstracts can evolve to achieve the necessary adequacy in the new digital environments. Three researching trends are proposed: theoretical, methodological and pragmatic. Theoretically, there are some needs for expanding the document concept, reengineering abstracting and designing interdisciplinary models. Methodologically, the trend is toward the structuring, automating and qualifying of the abstracts. Pragmatically, abstracts networking, combined with alternative and complementary models, open a new and promising horizon. Automating, structuring and qualifying abstracting/abstract offer some short‐term prospects for progress. Concludes that reengineering, networking and visualising would be middle‐term fruitful areas of research toward the full adequacy of abstracting in the new electronic age.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference64 articles.
1. Allen, B.L. (1998), “Visualization and cognitive abilities”, in Attherton, P. and Johnson, E. (Eds), Visualizing Subject Access for 21st Century Information Resources, Faculty of Library and Information Science, Urbana‐Champaign, IL.
2. Applegate, R. (1994), “Models of satisfaction”, Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Vol. 60, pp. 199‐227.
3. Belkin, N.J. (1990), “The cognitive viewpoint in information science”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 16, pp. 11‐15.
4. Belkin, N.J. and Robertson, S.E. (1976), “Information science and the phenomenon of information”, Journal of American Information Science, July/August, pp. 197‐204.
5. Blair, D.C. (2002), “Knowledge management: hype, hope or help?”, Journal of American Information Science, Vol. 53 No. 12, pp. 1019‐28.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献