Benchmarking performance of governance quality in Indian states using MCDM techniques

Author:

Raj Alok,Khanna Rupika

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to benchmarking the governance performance of Indian states. Design/methodology/approach This paper provides a framework to measure governance performance at the state level. Using the data on 28 key indicators, the authors evaluate Indian states on seven broad dimensions of governance quality covering several aspects of public service delivery, regulatory quality and law and order. The empirical methodology involves the application of multi-criteria decision making techniques in two steps. The authors, first develop suitable weights of the identified dimensions and criteria under each dimension by applying the inputs of an expert-based decision-panel in a best-worst framework. Next, using these weights, the authors evaluate ranking of each state using TOPSIS and PROMETHEE-II methods. Findings The results indicate wide disparities in the governance performance of Indian states. Based on different indicators, the paper evaluates the rank of all the major Indian states. Results reveal that “Social Service Delivery(S)” is the most influencing dimension for the development of a state. Overall, the authors find Andra Pradesh, NCT of Delhi and Goa to be the leading states in terms of governance quality. Research limitations/implications The paper provides policy makers with easy to use operational indicators to analyse the governance performance of Indian states. These would help in better monitoring of these states through competitive goal-setting for continuous improvement. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first formal assessment of governance quality in the Indian states in a multi-criteria framework. To this end, the paper addresses the issue of wide regional disparities in the country. The findings of the paper provide powerful insights to policy makers in setting up appropriate strategies to eliminate these disparities.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business and International Management,Strategy and Management

Reference76 articles.

1. A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection;International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations,2011

2. Bastow, S. (2013), “Oakwood prison failure should serve as a lesson to government on how not to do radical reform”, available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/ (accessed 13 January 2017).

3. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications;Expert Systems with Applications,2012

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Analysing the Effectiveness of MCDM and Integrated Weighting Approaches in Groundwater Quality Index Development;Water Conservation Science and Engineering;2024-06-22

2. Reckoning the performance of management institutions – A Mamdani fuzzy inference system approach;International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management;2023-12-20

3. Application of DEA and TOPSIS in Benchmarking Efficient Units of Energy Index of India;Handbook of Research on Stock Market Investment Practices and Portfolio Management;2022-06-30

4. Influence of governance instruments on supply chain quality: a qualitative investigation in the dairy industry;Benchmarking: An International Journal;2022-06-17

5. Multi-criteria decision-making toward supplier selection: exploration of PROMETHEE II method;Benchmarking: An International Journal;2021-09-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3