A survey of diversity and inclusiveness initiatives at Carnegie Doctoral Research Institutions libraries

Author:

Koury Regina,Semenza Jenny Lynne,Shropshire Sandra

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe survey findings on diversity and inclusion initiatives at the Carnegie Doctoral Research Institutions of Higher Education libraries. The findings would be helpful to libraries that are at the beginning of their own diversity and inclusion initiatives or that wish to compare ongoing efforts. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a survey of Carnegie Doctoral Research Institutions of Higher Education libraries using Qualtrics, an online survey software. Link to the survey with a short explanation was e-mailed to the 324 identified contacts and 151 responses were received at the end of the survey. Findings Survey responses revealed that the most prevalent types of diversity and inclusion initiatives fall into one of three categories. These are the creation/enhancement of library collections, recruitment and collaboration with other campus units. Not surprisingly, lack of money and other resources are identified as challenges faced by those who engage in these initiatives. Originality/value No other research currently exists for those interested in assessing diversity and inclusion initiatives at the Carnegie Doctoral Research Institutions of Higher Education libraries.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference14 articles.

1. ACRL (2012), “Diversity standards: cultural competency for academic libraries”, Association of College & Research Libraries, available at: www.ala.org/acrl/standards/diversity (accessed September 4, 2017).

2. ALA (n.d.), “Equity, diversity and inclusion key action areas”, American Library Association, available at: www.ala.org/aboutala/missionpriorities/keyactionareas (accessed September 4, 2017).

3. Racial microaggressions in academic libraries: results of a survey of minority and non-minority librarians;The Journal of Academic Librarianship,2015

4. Anaya, T. and Maxey-Harris, C. (2017), “SPEC Kit 356: Diversity and Inclusion”, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC, available at: http://publications.arl.org/Diversity-Inclusion-SPEC-Kit-356/ (accessed September 12, 2017).

5. The automaticity of social life;Current Directions in Psychological Science,2006

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3