Ownership relevance in aspect-oriented business process models
Author:
Leite Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado,Santoro Flavia Maria,Cappelli Claudia,Batista Thais Vasconcelos,Santos Fabiana Jack Nogueira
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to propose a representation scheme based on the i* strategic actor model to represent the process owner information and show how to incorporate this approach into the event driven process chain and Business Process Modeling Notation-BPMN meta-models and also into the aspect-oriented business process modeling (BPM) context.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors use a case study in a real setting to evaluate the proposal and a controlled experiment to get more evidence about its relevance.
Findings
– The authors presented evidence both from a case study in a real-world library showing the importance of representing – previously unavailable – process owner information, and from an experiment which involved participants analyzing the same models of the case study, confirming the preliminary evidences. It is important to stress the recognition that the proposed representation provided more transparency, in terms of ownership, than the usual BPM models. These benefits are due to the combination of the aspect-oriented approach and the strategic actor model, providing ownership information in a more transparent way.
Originality/value
– The authors not only argue the importance of clearly established process ownership, both of the core process and the aspectual process, but also the authors presented an approach to represent the actor involved in process and aspect ownership as an instantiation of the i* strategic actor. Using this approach, the process owner can be defined in terms of actors instead of the activities performed. It is also possible to define the aspect owner and to include the aspectual process concept in the business process model.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference33 articles.
1. Becker, J.
,
Rosemann, M.
and
von uthmann, C.
(2000), “Guidelines of business process modeling”, in
van der Aalst, W.
et al. (Eds),
Business Process Management, LNCS 1806
, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 30-49. 2. Bobrik, R.
,
Reichert, M.
and
Bauer, T.
(2007), “View-based process visualization”, in
Alonso, G.
,
Dadam, P.
and
Rosemann, M.
(Eds),
5th Proceedings of the International Business Process Management Conference, BPM 2007
, Vol. 4714, Springer, Brisbane and Berlin, pp. 88-95. 3. Cappelli, C.
,
Leite, J.C.S.P.
and
Oliveira, A.P.A.
(2007), “Exploring business process transparency concepts”, RE 2007, pp. 389-390. 4. Cappelli, C.
,
Santoro, F.
,
Leite, J.C.S.P.
,
Batista, T.
,
Medeiros, A.
and
Romeiro, C.
(2010), “Reflections on the modularity of business process models: the case for introducing the aspect-oriented paradigm”,
Business Process Management Journal
, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 662-687. 5. Dietz, J.
(2006),
Enterprise Ontology – Theory and Methodology
, ISBN-10 3-540-29169-5, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York, NY.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|