Author:
Archambault Susan Gardner
Abstract
Purpose
Research shows that postsecondary students are largely unaware of the impact of algorithms on their everyday lives. Also, most noncomputer science students are not being taught about algorithms as part of the regular curriculum. This exploratory, qualitative study aims to explore subject-matter experts’ insights and perceptions of the knowledge components, coping behaviors and pedagogical considerations to aid faculty in teaching algorithmic literacy to postsecondary students.
Design/methodology/approach
Eleven semistructured interviews and one focus group were conducted with scholars and teachers of critical algorithm studies and related fields. A content analysis was manually performed on the transcripts using a mixture of deductive and inductive coding. Data analysis was aided by the coding software program Dedoose (2021) to determine frequency totals for occurrences of a code across all participants along with how many times specific participants mentioned a code. Then, findings were organized around the three themes of knowledge components, coping behaviors and pedagogy.
Findings
The findings suggested a set of 10 knowledge components that would contribute to students’ algorithmic literacy along with seven behaviors that students could use to help them better cope with algorithmic systems. A set of five teaching strategies also surfaced to help improve students’ algorithmic literacy.
Originality/value
This study contributes to improved pedagogy surrounding algorithmic literacy and validates existing multi-faceted conceptualizations and measurements of algorithmic literacy.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Education
Reference86 articles.
1. Towards algorithmic experience: initial efforts for social media contexts,2018
2. Archambault, S.G. (2022), “Exploring algorithmic literacy for college students: an educator’s roadmap”, (Publication No. 2706673106), Doctoral dissertation, Loyola Marymount University, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
3. Everyday googling: results of an observational study and applications for teaching algorithmic literacy;Computers and Composition,2020
4. The social power of algorithms;Information, Communication and Society,2017
5. Just google it! Digital literacy and the epistemology of ignorance;Teaching in Higher Education,2019
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献