Author:
Vaz-Serra Paulo,Edwards Peter,Aranda-Mena Guillermo
Abstract
Purpose
Complex projects require careful management. They may expose stakeholders to greater risks and place additional demands upon resources. In the initial stages of project development, however, little may be known about the nature and magnitude of such complexity. This paper aims to ensure that this gap is at least subjectively assessed and addressed.
Design/methodology/approach
Research, using focus group workshops with a convenience sample of construction professionals, was carried out to test the validity of a Project Early Stage Complexity Assessment Tool (PESCAT). The PESCAT concept brings together selected complexity theories and uses subjectively based measures for assessment.
Findings
The findings confirm that an early-stage project complexity assessment tool is practicable and can contribute to project management practice in the construction industry. It should be applied by individual project stakeholders using small teams of experienced staff. PESCAT explores project complexity through “filter” sets of perspective factors which should be customised to reflect the stakeholder’s role and processes in a project.
Originality/value
In the initial complexity assessment model, resolution space and uncertainty were tested as project complexity parameters. However, in subsequent versions of the tool, four measures (differentiation and differentiation uncertainty; interdependency and interdependency uncertainty) are used in an innovative way that focuses users’ attention more clearly and points to a more targeted approach for addressing project complexity. The value of our model lies in its practical application and the project management benefits it can deliver.
Subject
Building and Construction,Architecture,Civil and Structural Engineering,General Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference34 articles.
1. Shared leadership and team creativity: construction industry perspective;Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2020
2. The importance of complexity for the research agenda in the built environment;Architectural Engineering and Design Management,2008
3. Towards a new synthesis in the modeling of evolving complex systems;Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,1985
4. Aranda-Mena, G. (2003), “Mapping workers’ cognitive structures of construction site hazards”, Unpublished PhD Thesis, School of Construction Management and Engineering, University of Reading, UK.
5. The concept of project complexity – a review;International Journal of Project Management,1996
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献