Affiliation:
1. 1 State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Nanjing 210023, China
2. 2 Frontiers Science Center for Critical Earth Material Cycling, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
3. 3 Institut des Sciences de la Terre d’Orléans (ISTO), Université d’Orléans, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (CNRS-BRGM), Unité mixte de recherche (UMR) 7327, Orléans 45100, France
Abstract
Abstract
Understanding the formation of high field strength element (HFSE) mineralization remains a challenge. Processes ranging from melt generation to final crystallization have been invoked to play a key role in the enrichment of HFSEs in magmatic-hydrothermal systems, yet the importance of crystal-liquid fractionation, liquid immiscibility, and/or fluid unmixing remains debated. Here, we present results of a study of granites and HFSE-mineralized glimmerites from the granitic Suzhou pluton, eastern China. We provide whole-rock major and trace element compositions, a description of mineral assemblages, and a detailed description of zircon textures, zircon Raman spectra, zircon major and trace element and δ18O compositions, and U-Pb ages. The granites and glimmerites have been dated at ~126 to 124 Ma and are thus coeval. The granites range from biotite and zircon poor to biotite and zircon rich and are in contact with glimmerites. The glimmerites form lenses and layers close to and along the margin of the Suzhou granite, comprising up to ~37 vol % biotite and up to ~2 vol % zircon and other HFSE-rich accessory minerals. The biotite-poor granites contain a single type of zircon (type-A: single crystals, oscillatory zoned, fully crystallized structure, relatively poor in trace elements, and relatively high δ18O), whereas the biotite-rich granites and the glimmerites contain two zircon types (type-A crystals: same features as in the biotite-poor granites; type-B crystals: clustered, unzoned, partially metamict structure, rich in trace elements, and relatively low δ18O). Both granite types are Si, Al, and Na rich, whereas the glimmerites are Fe, Ti, Mn, Mg, Ca, P, F, and HFSE rich and, compositionally, fall off simple fractionation trends. We interpret the textural, mineralogical, and compositional relationships to indicate that the glimmerites are the products of Fe-, F-, and HFSE-rich immiscible melts that unmixed from an alkali-rich, moderately reducing (~QFM + 0.5 and ~QFM + 1.0; QFM = quartz-fayalite-magnetite buffer) Suzhou magma system at low crustal pressure. In addition, we note that the zircon textures and compositions are important recorders of the processes and conditions that led to the HFSE mineralization.
Publisher
Society of Economic Geologists, Inc.
Subject
Economic Geology,Geochemistry and Petrology,Geology,Geophysics