Comparative analysis of bulk and velocity-derived density data in deep wells in the Adriatic Region (Italy)

Author:

Mariucci Maria Teresa1,Montone Paola1,Balossino Pietro2

Affiliation:

1. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy

2. Former Eni S.p.A, Natural Resources, San Donato Milanese, Italy

Abstract

This work is based on a systematic comparison between two datasets related to density data of geological formations crossed in 13 deep wells. The wells are located in the Adriatic area and reach depths of over 5000 meters. The main lithologies involved include sandstones, marls, clays, evaporite, and carbonate rocks. The first dataset concerns density values obtained from the analysis of sonic logs recorded along the wells, by applying the Gardner relation. The second dataset, on the other hand, refers to actually acquired density log measurements. Differences among the values in the two datasets have been calculated. The aim behind this work is to assess the reliability of rock densities estimated using the Gardner equation by comparing them to measurements obtained through density logs, despite many factors influencing the log density. This comparison of the densities obtained from various lithologies and geological formations leads us to draw, in this region, some initial considerations regarding the applicability and accuracy of Gardner formula, usually considered as standard reference, since the density log is generally available only within the reservoir. In the area we analyzed it is observed that the density values estimated from sonic velocities are underestimated for the Plio-Quaternary formations characterized by clayey-sandy lithologies by at least 0.1 g/cm3; whereas, densities of the carbonate sequences are overestimated by the same extent. Noteworthy, the density estimates deviate from the real values especially for gypsum units, overestimating by a factor of approximately 0.3 g/cm3. The results we obtained emphasize differences in density values when using the Gardner formula and suggest the need for taking into account the possible errors in the specific geological context or instead lithologies, such as those explored in this study.

Publisher

Instituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, INGV

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3