Affiliation:
1. KIRIKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ
2. KIRIKKALE UNIVERSITY
Abstract
With the development of technology, large databases become more accessible thanks to automation systems that automatically keep data and allow the use of large databases in many areas. Machine learning approaches, a sub-branch of artificial intelligence, are used in making decisions about the process by analyzing the data stored in databases and converting them into information. In this paper, the body production process of the surgical (medical) mask is analyzed. As it is known, surgical masks have become a part of our lives by becoming widespread all over the world with the COVID-19 pandemic. In the surgical mask body production process, using the real data of the production factors, first of all, filtering feature selection methods and analyzes were made and the feature selection method to be used was determined. With the specified feature selection method, the factors affecting the product quality are determined. Secondly, machine learning methods were used to determine the values and value ranges of factors (features) in the production of defect-free products. The performances of the machine learning models established in the second stage were increased by feature selection analysis. In the study, together with the parameter optimizations made to machine learning algorithms, it was seen that the best algorithm to estimate the defective product rate was the Ibk algorithm with 92.3% accuracy, 91.9% F measurement and 93% AUC value. Finally, in line with the decision rules revealed in the study, it was observed that the fabric types used for the upper/middle/lower layers that make up the body part in the mask body production process greatly affect the rates of defective or defect-free products. If the rod apparatus around the nose belongs to class k, it has been determined that many masks are defective. Improvement suggestions were presented according to the application results.
Publisher
Turkish National Defense University
Reference19 articles.
1. [1] Öztemel E. (2016). Artificial Neural Networks. 4nd ed. Istanbul, Turkey, Papatya Press.
2. [2] Doğan A, Birant D. (2021). “Machine learning and data mining in manufacturing”. Expert Systems with Applications, 166(2021), 1-22.
3. [3] Öztemel E, Gürsev S. (2018). “Literature review of industry 4.0 and related technologies”. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(2020), 127-182.
4. [4] Cho E, Jun J, Chang T, Choi Y. (2020). “Quality prediction modeling of plastic extrusion process”. ICIC Express Letters Part B: Applications, 11(5), 447–452.
5. [5] Chen K, Hu YH, Hsieh YC. (2015). “Predicting customer churn from valuable B2B customers in the logistics industry: A case study”. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 13(2015), 475–494.