The differences of the institutional environment of the activities of firms of varying size on the example of ferrous metallurgy

Author:

Blokhin A. A.1ORCID,Dranev S. Y.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Economic Forecasting of RAS; Financial University

2. Institute of Economic Forecasting of RAS

Abstract

Introduction. The article shows the importance of the factor of institutional differences in the development of the Russian economy, in particular — the steel markets.Methods. In this article, we proposed some institutional criteria to determine the institutional differences, by which we selected three samples — the largest, large, medium-sized ferrous metallurgy companies with a foundry technological redistribution for a higher degree of comparability. Initially, we determined a sample of companies on the basis of annual revenue. Further, we examined all three samples of companies in terms of economic criteria for the last ten reporting years — from 2008 to 2017. We selected the main directions of the considered criteria for comparing groups of enterprises: ratings, market coverage, level of state support, access to financing.Results. The study was able to determine that each of the samples has its own characteristics of development and performance indicators. At the same time, a comparison of the dynamics of economic indicators in the three institutionally different groups shows that the first sector significantly exceeds the second and third in terms of both volume indicators and the dynamics of their growth. The differences between the second and third sectors are less pronounced, but also in favour of the second. In general, groups of companies, separated by institutional characteristics, demonstrate marked differences in the dynamics of economic parameters. A comparative analysis of the technological level, despite the lack of detailed studies, showed that the selected groups of companies differ significantly in terms of access to new and high technologies, and the level of interaction with universities.Discussion. The approach described in the article allows predicting the development of markets and industries, taking into account the selected institutional and economic features. Also, besides the distinction according to the institutional characteristics of a group of companies in terms of economic parameters, further studies of their technological level are required.

Publisher

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Reference21 articles.

1. Greif А. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge University Press; 2006. 505 p.

2. Acemoğlu D. Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton University Press; 2011. 851 p.

3. North D. C. Institutions institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press; 1990. 152 p.

4. Blokhin A. A. Economy of Unnecessary Output (Institutional Characteristics of the Circuit of Losses). Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic policy. 2015;(1):7–40. URL: http://www.ep.ranepa.ru/archiv/2015/1#title. (In Russ.).

5. Blokhin A. A. Institutional framework and factors of economic growth in the future. Problemi prognozirovaniya = Forecasting problems. 2012;(6):52–58. (In Russ.).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3