Affiliation:
1. Moscow State Institute of Electronics Technology (Technical University)
Abstract
The goals and objectives of the study are to compare different ideas about historical knowledge in the aspect of legitimizing the social system, to compare the main characteristics of social projects and their approaches to understanding the beginning of Russian statehood. The study used the methods of comparative analysis when examining the object in all its interrelationships and contradictions. Also, the author used the ascent from the abstract to the concrete in the unity of the historical and logical approaches. The author refers to the description of the nature of social myth in the works of J. Frazer, A. F. Loseva, E. Fromm, who analyses the views of the social reality of domestic and foreign researchers. The work results continue and develop the discussion about the foundations of Russian statehood, presented in the works of various authors. The study allows for a comparative analysis of various social projects, the degree of their utopianism, and, consequently, their viability and feasibility.
Publisher
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Reference7 articles.
1. Frazer J. J. The Golden Branch: A Study of Magic and R eligion. Moscow: Eksmo; 2006. 960 p. (In Russ.).
2. Losev A. F. Dialectics of myth. Moscow: Thought; 2001. 558 p. (In Russ.).
3. Fromm E. Man for himself. Study of the psychological problems of ethics. Moscow: AST; 2010. 352 p. (In Russ.).
4. Schoon Eric W., Duxbury Scott W. Robust Discourse and the Politics of Legitimacy: Framing International Intervention in Syrian Civil War, 2011–2016. Sociological Science. 2019;(6):635–660.
5. Karamzin N. M. History of the Russian state. Moscow: Eksmo; 2012. 1024 p. (In Russ.).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Russian Statehood: Contemporary Political Views;RUDN Journal of Public Administration;2022-12-30