Affiliation:
1. Saint Petersburg State University
Abstract
This article is devoted to the climate change agenda of the Party of European Socialists. In order to identify its current main features, the author characterizes the development of the climate discourse of the party under the influence of socialist, workers and social-democratic ideological foundations, as well as the political situation in the European Union at various historical stages. Through comparative analysis and discourse analysis, the general evolution and main principles of the Party of European Socialists and its political group, the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats, as well as the actual development and current priorities of the climate agenda are investigated. Comparative analysis and discourse analysis are carried out through the prism of election manifestos and the top officials’ rhetoric. The relevance of the study lies in the primacy of climate change for the European Union and its citizens, as well as the substantial modernization of supranational legislation under the leadership of Frans Timmermans, a member of the Party of European Socialists and Executive Vice-President of the European Commission for the European “Green Deal”.
Publisher
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Reference12 articles.
1. Aust A. From ‘Eurokeynesianism’ to the ‘Third Way’: The Party of European Socialists (PES) and European employment policies. Social Democratic Party Policies in Contemporary Europe. Bonoli G., Powell M., eds. London: Routledge; 2003.
2. Lodge J., Herman V. Direct Elections to the European Parliament: A Community Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 1982.
3. Hix S. The Party of European Socialists. Social Democratic Parties in the European Union: History, Organization, Policies. Ladrech R., Marlière P., eds. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 1999.
4. Houser T. Copenhagen, the Accord, and the Way Forward. Policy Brief. 2010;10(5):1–17.
5. Hovi J., Skodvin T., Andresen S. The Persistence of the Kyoto Protocol: Why Other Annex I Countries Move on Without the United States. Global Environmental Politics. 2003;3(4):1–23.