Power Legitimacy: Towards the Creation of an Operational Model

Author:

Chimiris E. S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Financial University

Abstract

The legitimacy of power is difficult to assess and predict, so the author of the article sets himself the task of formulating an operational model for describing the legitimacy of power and suggests using a discursive approach to the analysis of political processes. The use of discursive methods allows using not only sociological surveys but also to find cheaper and more effective methods of analysing opinions and ideas. The development of such a model will open the way to the formation of a tool for assessing the level of legitimacy of power and forecasting crises of legitimacy in a particular state. Turning to the discursive dimension of the description of legitimacy allows us to designate specific variables and to describe and evaluate them. As the main methodological concept, the author suggests using idealised cognitive models in the terminology of J. Lakoff (frames, figurative-schematic structures, metaphors and metonyms). Further, based on the traditions of studying the legitimacy of power in political and social science, as well as applying a discursive approach, the author formulates an operational model of legitimation consisting of three main elements: institutional order, leaders and elites, historical and cultural traditions. The formulation of the primary hypothesis is based on the assumption that the coincidence of the models of legitimation of power formulated by political leaders and perceived by the population will contribute to increased support for the authorities. The ability to approach the formation of tools for assessing and predicting crises of legitimacy can be useful both for describing and forecasting domestic policy and for evaluating the political risks of investments and cooperation with other countries.

Publisher

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Subject

General Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. Tilly Ch. From mobilisation to revolution. Moscow: HSE; 2019. (In Russ.).

2. Eisenstadt Sh. Revolution and transformation of societies. Comparative study of civilisations. Moscow: Aspect Press; 1999. (In Russ.).

3. Skocpol Th. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1979.

4. Rozov N. S., Pustovoit Yu.A., Filippov S. I., Tsygankov V.V. Revolutionary waves of the second half of the twentieth century: the relationship of geopolitics, violence, and legitimacy. Polis. 2019;(2):24–40. (In Russ.).

5. Schultz E. E. To the question about the classification of revolutions. Polity. 2018;2(89):137–155. (In Russ.).

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3