Ontology of Humanitarian Knowledge in the Information society

Author:

Gerasimov S. V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Saint Petersburg State University of Economics

Abstract

The Humanities, throughout the formation of the cultural experience of humankind, depended on the environment in which they developed, and on the concepts of reality that prevailed in this environment. Modern Humanities are in a state of uncertainty as concerns its roles, including those associated with the rapid evolution of the contemporary information society. The purpose of this article is to overcome this uncertainty. The author presents the main stages of interaction evolution and the ontology of humanitarian knowledge in the digital society in the last two decades. The article is a partial representation of the results of intercollegiate research conducted in 2019 at the Faculty of Free Arts and Sciences of Saint Petersburg State University: “Narratives of public communications in modern Russia”. The process of studying the ontology of humanitarian knowledge in the digital environment is a continuous one because reality is changing dynamically. Researchers are in a dual position: it is possible to study and generalise the observed results during the period of transition from post-industrial society to the modern concept of reality; to model the future conceptual sphere as a set of entities and categories that are in event interaction as a communicative environment with predetermined parameters. At the same time, it is necessary to take into account the fact that the social reality of modern society has already formed its interdisciplinary specificity, which is subject to ontological understanding.

Publisher

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Subject

General Medicine

Reference16 articles.

1. Lukina N.P., Samohina N.N. On the methodological potential of the concept of technological structure. Informacionnoe obshhestvo. 2016;6:4–10. (In Russ.).

2. Gerasimov S.V. Some trends in human development. Filosofskie nauki. 2015;3:133–137. (In Russ.).

3. Tulchinskij G. L. Subjectivity and post-secularity of modernity: new transcendence or fractality of the “flat” world? Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovatelej kul’tury. 2013;3(12):50–56. (In Russ.).

4. Gerasimov S.V. Event as a managerial function of generating social reality. Chelovek. Kultura. Obrazovanie. 2017;1(23):68–83. (In Russ.).

5. Digital Humanities: Chrestomathy. M. Terras, D. Najhan, Je. Vanhutta, I. Kizhner, eds. Transl. from Eng. Krasnojarsk; 2017. (In Russ.).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Problems of Humanitarian Knowledge in the Era of Total Digitalization;Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University;2022-10-16

2. Humanitarian knowledge in the age of digitization: challenges and results;SHS Web of Conferences;2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3