Abstract
Existent philosophical literature has been largely focusing on the ethical aspects and controversies of developing and using smart technologies such as AI and big data, whereas human capital and infrastructural environment as pre-existing factors have been covered by AI Ethics in a lesser extent. Most of the current research focuses on technical infrastructural aspects in the implementation of complex «smart projects», while insufficient attention is paid to the role of social capital. In order to widen the focus and to include human capital and infrastructural developments coming along with the increasing role of AI, the paper takes a novel look at philosophical underpinnings of smart cities and discusses the concept of the Russian Naukograd (literally from Russian – City of Science, or Researchers’ city, meaning a city which is developing as a community of scientists and academics) as a historical approach for smart city concept implementation. The authors apply theoretical methods of cognition (analysis, synthesis) as well as the case study approach to the Russian (Soviet) experience in forming research-driven cities in order to highlight the value of high scientific, industrial and educational capital («smart nation») as a fundamental factor for the stable long-term development of modern cities. The findings suggest that some concepts of the Russian Naukograd for example the focus on research and education are valuable and that investment in social capital (i. e., people) should stand on the same footing as investment in technology developing a smart city. In this approach the prefix «smart» may stand for «smart citizens/nations» as a pivotal framework at the initial stages of smart cities development.
Publisher
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Reference22 articles.
1. Annas J. An introduction to Plato’s Republic. 1982. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1982. 370 p.
2. Mohr R. D. Platonic cosmology. Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill Academic Publishers; 2016. 212 p.
3. Geuss R. Philosophy and real politics. Princeton, NJ; Oxford: Princeton University Press; 2008. 128 p.
4. Mancebo F. Smart city strategies: Time to involve people. Comparing Amsterdam, Barcelona, and Paris. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability. 2020;13(2):133–152. DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2019.1649711
5. Nam T., Pardo T. A. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: Proc. 12th Annu. int. digital government res. conf. on digital government innovation in challenging times (College Park, MD, June 12–15, 2011). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery; 2011:282–291. DOI: 10.1145/2037556.2037602