The Impact of Cognitive Distortions on Decision Making in Agile Project Management Frameworks: Current Positions and Perspectives in the Academic Community

Author:

Khamitov D. A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. RANEPA

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to review the current positions and views of the scientific community regarding the influence of cognitive distortions (both individual and group) on decision-making within such an approach to project management as agile framework. The article defines the concepts of “project”, “project management”, “agile project management framework”, “heuristics”, “cognitive distortions”; it describes what kind of decisions (according to the hierarchical structure) can be made when using agile project management frameworks. On the basis of analysis of a number of scientific works, the existence of the problem of success (efficiency) of implemented (including IT) projects even if modern flexible frameworks of project management are used is fixed. The author of the study considers the concept of heuristics and cognitive distortions (both individual and group), describes the manifestation of individual and group cognitive biases, gives examples of individual and group cognitive biases’ impact to decisions taken in Agile project management. As a result, the author proposes a classification of likely to manifest individual and group cognitive biases at each of the three levels of decision-making in Agile (according to the hierarchical structure): operational decisions, tactical decisions, strategic decisions. The author also provides an overview of the development of decision-making theory and describes three main approaches to the consideration of the empirical decision-making process: according to D. Kahneman and A. Tversky (heuristic approach; behavioral economics), according to G. Gigerenzer (ecological rationality approach), according to G. Klein (naturalistic approach). The author also identifies a possible further vector for the development of research in this direction. The result of the work was the classification of probable individual and group cognitive distortions at each of the three levels of decision-making in flexible project management frameworks (according to the hierarchical structure): operational, tactical, and strategic.

Publisher

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Reference37 articles.

1. Heldman K. PMP: Project management professional study guide. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2005. 592 p. (Russ. ed.: Heldman K. Professional’noe upravlenie proeektom. Moscow: Laboratoriya znanii = Knowledge laboratory; 2022. 763 p.).

2. Wegemer G.B., ed. New Atlantis (1626) by Francis Bacon. Irving, TX: CTMS Publishers at the University of Dallas; 2020. 47 p.

3. Marinho M., Sampaio S., Lima T., de Moura H. A systematic review of uncertainties in software project management. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications. 2014;5(6):1–21. DOI: 10.5121/ijsea.2014.5601

4. Macedo K., Marinho M., Santos S. Uncertainty management in software projects: A case study in a public company. Journal of Convergence Information Technology. 2019;14(1):61–67.

5. McDaid K., Greer D., Keenan F., et al. Managing uncertainty in agile release planning. In: Proc. 18th Int. conf. on software engineering & knowledge sngineering (SEKE’2006). (San Francisco, CA, July 5–7, 2006). Skokie, IL: Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School; 2006:138–143. URL: https://ksiresearchorg.ipage.com/seke/Proceedings/seke/SEKE2006_Proceedings.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3