Affiliation:
1. Pontifical Gregorian University
Abstract
The custom of burning mock-money as a symbolic offering of nutrients and sustenance to one's ancestors in the Afterlife is here analysed in terms of its economic meaning and significance. The theme is treated from two different angles. One is that of the political economy of the gift, which concerns itself with the final uses to which society conveys its economic surplus. The other is that of monetary institutionalism, which seeks to understand what the practice itself actually represents in light of the monetary arrangements that rule the economic exchange within the community itself. The thesis is that, at a first remove, the custom appears to fall into the category of “wasteful expenditure,” in that it is not manifestly conducive to any augmentation of the system's efficiency. But on a subtler level, it is not precisely so for two orders of reasons. First, because the custom is habitually accompanied by subsidiary donations; second, because, in this donative moment, the custom importantly reveals, through its conversion of real cash into “sacrificial” token-money, a constitutive yet hidden, property of money, namely its perishability.
Publisher
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Reference25 articles.
1. Bataille Georges. La part maudite, precedee de la notion de depense. Paris: Les fiditions de minuit; 1967 [1949].
2. Blake C. Fred. Burning Money. The Material Spirit of Chinese Lifeworld. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press; 2011a.
3. Blake C. Fred. Lampooning the Paper-Money Custom in Contemporary China. Journal of Asian Studies. 2011b; 70 (2, May) : 449-459.
4. Casey Michael J., Vigna Paul. The Age of Cryptocurrency: How Bitcoin and Digital Money Are Challenging the Global Economic Order. New York: Random House; 2015.
5. China is Developing its Own Digital Currency. Bloomberg. April 2017 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-23/pboc-is-going-digital-as-mobile-payments-boom-transforms-economy