Abstract
This article is neither an empirical nor an analytical study; rather, it is a concise statement of a research paradigm that reflects the personal (and perhaps idiosyncratic) concerns of its author, which he wishes to continue and elaborate upon in much further detail at some point in the near future (if any). The general concern is with devising a functional criminological taxonomy of the multitudinous mutabilities migrating between neo-liberal political economy and organised and semi-organised criminality, here defined as criminogenic asymmetries. My central premise is this: although frequently associated in the scholarly literature with corruption, underdevelopment, anomie, and the breakdown of the brokerage of trust, neo-liberalism itself is the sufficient explanation for criminogenic asymmetries. As should be expected, the “moral panic” over the “death of democracy”, already part of our post-1989 history but currently symbolised by the “power crime” presidency of Donald J. Trump, w ill be utilised as the primary empirical example of these trends, both concurrent and convergent.
Publisher
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Reference43 articles.
1. Arrighi Giovanni, Silver Beverley J. Introduction. In Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System (1-36). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1999.
2. Babones Salvatore. The New Authoritarianism: Trump, Populism, and the Tyranny of Experts. Cambridge UK: Polity; 2018.
3. Badiou Alain. Trump. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 2019.
4. Brighi Elisabetta, Cerella Antonio. An Alternative Vision of Politics and Violence: Introducing Mimetic Theory in International Studies. Journal of International Political Theory. 2015;11 (1) : 3-25.
5. Brown Wendy. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books; 2015.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献