Healthcare Financing: European Experience and Russian Practice

Author:

Antropov V. V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Financial University; Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas Moscow

Abstract

The subject of the research is healthcare financing systems in European countries and Russia. The relevance of the problem stems from the possibility of using successful foreign experience for the organization of healthcare financing in Russia. The purpose of the research was to examine the specific features of the establishing and funding healthcare models in countries of Europe and the possibilities of their experience in organizing healthcare financing in the Russian Federation. The paper examines the current state of the two models of health financing in the EU — budget funding and insurance. By the example of individual European countries, the operation specifics of each model are analyzed, their advantages and disadvantages are assessed. Particular attention is paid to the specifics of the healthcare financing system in Russia and its difference from foreign systems. Taking into account the foreign experience and the need to improve the Russian compulsory healthcare insurance (CHI) system, the paper proposes ways to improve the Russian model of healthcare financing: establishment of a unified organizational and financial CHI model; introduction of a system of equal participation of the employer and employee in the financing of compulsory healthcare insurance; introduction of a family insurance system; promotion of voluntary healthcare insurance programs. It is concluded that the keypoint in the CHI system restructuring should be the search for socially acceptable and economically justified forms of attracting public funds. At the same time, it is extremely important that the funds received by medical institutions do not increase the shadow incomes in the economy but are spent on the development of the healthcare system.

Publisher

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Reference15 articles.

1. Beveridge W. Full employment in a free society. London; 1944.

2. Cylus J., Richardson E., Findley L., Longley M., O’Neill C., Steel D. United Kingdom: health system review. In: European observatory on health systems and policies. Сopenhagen; 2015:18–19.

3. Mossialos E. H., Tomson S. Voluntary health insurance in the European Union. Moscow: Ves’ mir; 2006. 224 p. (In Russ.).

4. Berthet F., Calteux A., Wolter M., Michèle W., Weber L. Luxembourg: HiT in brief. In: European observatory on health systems and policies. Copenhagen; 2015:6–7.

5. Busse R., Blümel M. Germany: health system review. In: European observatory on health systems and policies. Copenhagen; 2014:121–122.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3