A method for analyzing suspect-filler similarity using convolutional neural networks

Author:

AYDIN Derviş Emre1ORCID,AR Yilmaz2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lawyer, Ankara Bar

2. ANKARA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING, COMPUTER ENGINEERING PR.

Abstract

Eyewitness misidentifications are one of the leading factors in wrongful convictions. This study focuses on the structure of the lineups, which is one of the factors that cause misidentification, and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the selection of fillers to be included in the lineups. In the study, AI-based face recognition systems are used to determine the level of similarity of fillers to the suspect. Using two different face recognition models with a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) structure, similarity threshold values close to human performance were calculated (VGG Face and Cosine similarity = 0.383, FaceNet and Euclidean l2 = 1.16). In the second part of the study, the problems that are likely to be caused by facial recognition systems used in the selection of fillers are examined. The results of the study reveal that models responsible for facial recognition may not suffice alone in the selection of fillers and, an advanced structure using CNN models trained to recognize other attributes (race, gender, age, etc.) associated with similarity along with face recognition models would produce more accurate results. In the last part of the study, a Line-up application that can analyze attributes such as facial similarity, race, gender, age, and facial expression, is introduced.

Funder

Yok

Publisher

Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering

Reference59 articles.

1. Connor, E., Lundregan, T., Miller, N., McEwan, T., Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial, Office of Justice Programs, 1996.

2. Garrett, B., Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong, Harvard University Press, 2011.

3. Innocence Project, Eyewitness Identification Reform, 2018. Retrieved February 17, 2022, https://innocenceproject.org/eyewitness-identification-reform/.

4. Saks, M. J., Koehler, J. J., The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science, Science, 309 (5736) (2005), 892–895, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111565.

5. Berkowitz, S. R., Loftus, E., Misinformation in the courtroom, H. Otgaar, M. L. Howe (Eds.), Finding the Truth in the Courtroom: Dealing with Deception, Lies, and Memories, Oxford University Press, 2018, 11–20.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3