AI model disgorgement: Methods and choices

Author:

Achille Alessandro1,Kearns Michael12,Klingenberg Carson1ORCID,Soatto Stefano13

Affiliation:

1. Amazon Web Services Artificial Intelligence (AWS AI), Pasadena, CA 91125

2. Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19130

3. Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095

Abstract

Over the past few years, machine learning models have significantly increased in size and complexity, especially in the area of generative AI such as large language models. These models require massive amounts of data and compute capacity to train, to the extent that concerns over the training data (such as protected or private content) cannot be practically addressed by retraining the model “from scratch” with the questionable data removed or altered. Furthermore, despite significant efforts and controls dedicated to ensuring that training corpora are properly curated and composed, the sheer volume required makes it infeasible to manually inspect each datum comprising a training corpus. One potential approach to training corpus data defects is model disgorgement, by which we broadly mean the elimination or reduction of not only any improperly used data, but also the effects of improperly used data on any component of an ML model. Model disgorgement techniques can be used to address a wide range of issues, such as reducing bias or toxicity, increasing fidelity, and ensuring responsible use of intellectual property. In this paper, we survey the landscape of model disgorgement methods and introduce a taxonomy of disgorgement techniques that are applicable to modern ML systems. In particular, we investigate the various meanings of “removing the effects” of data on the trained model in a way that does not require retraining from scratch.

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Reference48 articles.

1. W. article Disgorgement (2024). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disgorgement.

2. Algorithmic disgorgement: Destruction of artificial intelligence models as the FTC’s newest enforcement tool for bad data;Goland J. A.;Richm. J. Law Technol.,2023

3. Y. Dukler et al. Safe: Machine unlearning with shard graphs. arXiv [Preprint] (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.13169 (Accessed 31 December 2023).

4. L. Bourtoule et al. “Machine unlearning” in 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (2021) pp. 141–159.

5. Y. Wu E. Dobriban S. Davidson “Deltagrad: Rapid retraining of machine learning models” in International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR 2020) pp. 10355–10366.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Supporting Trustworthy AI Through Machine Unlearning;Science and Engineering Ethics;2024-09-11

2. Grounding and Evaluation for Large Language Models: Practical Challenges and Lessons Learned (Survey);Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining;2024-08-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3