Abstract
As a leading effort to improve the welfare of smallholder farmers, several governments have led major reforms in improving market access for these farmers through online agricultural platforms. Leveraging collaboration with the state government of Karnataka, India, this paper provides an empirical assessment on the impact of such a reform—implementation of the Unified Market Platform (UMP)—on market prices and farmers’ profitability. UMP was created in 2014 to unify all trades in the agricultural wholesale markets of the state to be carried out within a single platform. By November 2019, 62.8 million metric tons of commodities valued at $21.7 billion (USD) have been traded on UMP. Employing a difference-in-differences method, we demonstrate that the impact of UMP on modal prices varies substantially across commodities. In particular, the implementation of UMP has yielded an average 5.1%, 3.6%, and 3.5% increase in the modal prices of paddy, groundnut, and maize. Furthermore, UMP has generated a greater benefit for farmers who produce higher-quality commodities. Given low profit margins of smallholder farmers (2 to 9%), the range of profit improvement is significant (36 to 159%). In contrast, UMP has no statistically significant impact on the modal prices of cotton, green gram, or tur. Using detailed market data from UMP, we analyze how features related to logistical challenges, bidding efficiency, in-market concentration, and the price discovery process differ between commodities with and without a significant price increase due to UMP. These analyses lead to several policy insights regarding the design of similar agri-platforms in developing countries.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference20 articles.
1. D. Byerlee , A. De Janvry , E. Sadoulet , R. Townsend , I. Klytchnikova , “World Development Report, 2008: Agriculture for development” (2007, World Bank, Washington, DC). https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/5990/WDR%202008%20-%20English.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y. Accessed 20 April 2019.
2. L. F. Bergquist , M. Dinerstein , Competition and entry in agricultural markets: Experimental evidence from Kenya. https://www.povertyactionlab.org/sites/default/files/publications/Competition-and-Entry-in-Agriculture-Markets_Bergquist%26Dinerstein_Sept2019.pdf (21 September 2019).
3. The Digital Provide: Information (Technology), Market Performance, and Welfare in the South Indian Fisheries Sector
4. Is IT enough? Evidence from a natural experiment in India’s agriculture markets;Parker;Manag. Sci.,2016
5. Impact of SMS-Based Agricultural Information on Indian Farmers
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献