Abstract
Does birth order shape people’s propensity to take risks? Evidence is mixed. We used a three-pronged approach to investigate birth-order effects on risk taking. First, we examined the propensity to take risks as measured by a self-report questionnaire administered in the German Socio-Economic Panel, one of the largest and most comprehensive household surveys. Second, we drew on data from the Basel–Berlin Risk Study, one of the most exhaustive attempts to measure risk preference. This study administered 39 risk-taking measures, including a set of incentivized behavioral tasks. Finally, we considered the possibility that birth-order differences in risk taking are not reflected in survey responses and laboratory studies. We thus examined another source of behavioral data: the risky life decision to become an explorer or a revolutionary. Findings from these three qualitatively different sources of data and analytic methods point unanimously in the same direction: We found no birth-order effects on risk taking.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference45 articles.
1. Sulloway FJ (1996) Born to Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics, and Creative Lives (Pantheon, New York).
2. Sulloway FJ (2001) Birth order, sibling competition, and human behavior. Conceptual Challenges in Evolutionary Psychology, ed Holcomb HR (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), pp 39–83.
3. Birth Order and Risk Taking in Athletics: A Meta-Analysis and Study of Major League Baseball
4. Sulloway FJ (1999) Birth order. Encyclopedia of Creativity, eds Runco MA Pritzker S (Academic, San Diego, CA), pp 189–202.
5. Sulloway FJ (2010) Why siblings are like Darwin’s finches: Birth order, sibling competition, and adaptive divergence within the family. The Evolution of Personality and Individual Differences, eds Buss DM Hawley PH (Oxford Univ Press, New York), pp 86–119.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献