Abstract
Our state of arousal can significantly affect our ability to make optimal decisions, judgments, and actions in real-world dynamic environments. The Yerkes–Dodson law, which posits an inverse-U relationship between arousal and task performance, suggests that there is a state of arousal that is optimal for behavioral performance in a given task. Here we show that we can use online neurofeedback to shift an individual’s arousal from the right side of the Yerkes–Dodson curve to the left toward a state of improved performance. Specifically, we use a brain–computer interface (BCI) that uses information in the EEG to generate a neurofeedback signal that dynamically adjusts an individual’s arousal state when they are engaged in a boundary-avoidance task (BAT). The BAT is a demanding sensory-motor task paradigm that we implement as an aerial navigation task in virtual reality and which creates cognitive conditions that escalate arousal and quickly results in task failure (e.g., missing or crashing into the boundary). We demonstrate that task performance, measured as time and distance over which the subject can navigate before failure, is significantly increased when veridical neurofeedback is provided. Simultaneous measurements of pupil dilation and heart-rate variability show that the neurofeedback indeed reduces arousal. Our work demonstrates a BCI system that uses online neurofeedback to shift arousal state and increase task performance in accordance with the Yerkes–Dodson law.
Funder
Army Research Office
Army Research Laboratory
National Science Foundation
UK Economic and Social Research Council
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference45 articles.
1. Sallet J (2011) Neuroanatomical basis of motivational and cognitive control: A focus on the medial and lateral prefrontal cortex. Neural Basis of Motivational and Cognitive Control, ed Mars R (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
2. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update
3. Gray WR (2005) Boundary-avoidance tracking: A new pilot tracking model. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA), pp 86–97. Available at https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2005-5810 .
4. Dotter JD (2007) An analysis of aircraft handling quality data obtained from boundary avoidance tracking flight test techniques. Master’s thesis (Department of the Air Force Air University, Air Force Institute of Technology, WPAFB, OH).
5. Gray WR (2008) A generalized handling qualities flight test technique utilizing boundary avoidance tracking. US Air Force T&E Days Conferences (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA), p 1648.
Cited by
89 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献