Abstract
We develop a model describing how false paradigms may persist, hindering scientific progress. The model features two paradigms, one describing reality better than the other. Tenured scientists display homophily: They favor tenure candidates who adhere to their paradigm. As in statistics, power is the probability (absent any bias) of denying tenure to scientists adhering to the false paradigm. The model shows that because of homophily, when power is low, the false paradigm may prevail. Then, only an increase in power can ignite convergence to the true paradigm. Historical case studies suggest that low power comes either from lack of empirical evidence or from reluctance to base tenure decisions on available evidence.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference33 articles.
1. Friedman M (1953) The methodology of positive economics. Essays in Positive Economics (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp 3–43.
2. Kuhn TS (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago), 3rd Ed.
3. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
4. Dovidio JF Gaertner SL (2010) Intergroup bias. Handbook of Social Psychology, eds Fiske ST Gilbert DT Lindzey G (Wiley, New York), pp 1084–1121.
5. Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献