Abstract
A foundational question in the social sciences concerns the interplay of underlying causes in the formation of people’s political beliefs and prejudices. What role, if any, do genes, environmental influences, or personality dispositions play? Social dominance orientation (SDO), an influential index of people’s general attitudes toward intergroup hierarchy, correlates robustly with political beliefs. SDO consists of the subdimensions SDO-dominance (SDO-D), which is the desire people have for some groups to be actively oppressed by others, and SDO-egalitarianism (SDO-E), a preference for intergroup inequality. Using a twin design (n = 1,987), we investigate whether the desire for intergroup dominance and inequality makes up a genetically grounded behavioral syndrome. Specifically, we investigate the heritability of SDO, in addition to whether it genetically correlates with support for political policies concerning the distribution of power and resources to different social groups. In addition to moderate heritability estimates for SDO-D and SDO-E (37% and 24%, respectively), we find that the genetic correlation between these subdimensions and political attitudes was overall high (mean genetic correlation 0.51), while the environmental correlation was very low (mean environmental correlation 0.08). This suggests that the relationship between political attitudes and SDO-D and SDO-E is grounded in common genetics, such that the desire for (versus opposition to) intergroup inequality and support for political attitudes that serve to enhance (versus attenuate) societal disparities form convergent strategies for navigating group-based dominance hierarchies.
Funder
Danish Research Council
Norwegian Research Council
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference82 articles.
1. J. Sidanius , F. Pratto , Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999).
2. Evolutionary political psychology;Petersen,2015
3. P. E. Tetlock , “Psychology and politics: The challenges of integrating levels of analysis in social science” in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, A. W. Kruglanski , T. E. Higgins , Eds. (Guildford Press, New York, NY, ed. 2, 2007), pp 888–912.
4. C. Boehm , Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999).
5. D. P. Watts , “Dominance, power, and politics in nonhuman and human primates” in Mind the Gap, P. Kappeler , J. Silk , Eds. (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010), pp. 109–138.
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献