Abstract
Computational phylogenetics is in the process of revolutionizing historical linguistics. Recent applications have shed new light on controversial issues, such as the location and time depth of language families and the dynamics of their spread. So far, these approaches have been limited to single-language families because they rely on a large body of expert cognacy judgments or grammatical classifications, which is currently unavailable for most language families. The present study pursues a different approach. Starting from raw phonetic transcription of core vocabulary items from very diverse languages, it applies weighted string alignment to track both phonetic and lexical change. Applied to a collection of ∼1,000 Eurasian languages and dialects, this method, combined with phylogenetic inference, leads to a classification in excellent agreement with established findings of historical linguistics. Furthermore, it provides strong statistical support for several putative macrofamilies contested in current historical linguistics. In particular, there is a solid signal for the Nostratic/Eurasiatic macrofamily.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
EC | European Research Council
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference45 articles.
1. Hammarström H Forkel R Haspelmath M Bank S (2015) Glottolog 2.5 (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany). Available at glottolog.org. Accessed September 11, 2015
2. Greenberg JH (2000) Indo-European and Its Closest Relatives: Grammar (Stanford Univ Press, Palo Alto, CA)
3. Greenberg JH (2002) Indo-European and Its Closest Relatives: Lexicon (Stanford Univ Press, Palo Alto, CA)
4. Ultraconserved words point to deep language ancestry across Eurasia
5. Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献