Abstract
The south central Andes is known as a region of enduring multiethnic diversity, yet it is also the cradle of one the South America’s first successful expansive-state societies. Social structures that encouraged the maintenance of separate identities among coexistent ethnic groups may explain this apparent contradiction. Although the early expansion of the Tiwanaku state (A.D. 600–1000) is often interpreted according to a centralized model derived from Old World precedents, recent archaeological research suggests a reappraisal of the socio-political organization of Tiwanaku civilization, both for the diversity of social entities within its core region and for the multiple agencies behind its wider program of agropastoral colonization. Tiwanaku’s sociopolitical pluralism in both its homeland and colonies tempers some of archaeology’s global assumptions about the predominant role of centralized institutions in archaic states.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference111 articles.
1. Jones SR (1997) The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present (Psychology Press, London)
2. Ethnogenesis at Galindo, Peru;Bawden,2005
3. Approaches to the Archaeology of Ethnogenesis: Past and Emergent Perspectives
4. Ethnicity in complex societies: Archaeological perspectives;Emberling;J Archaeol Res,1997
5. Barth F (1998) Introduction. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference, ed Barth F (Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL), pp 9–38
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献