Author:
van den Berg Pieter,Molleman Lucas,Weissing Franz J.
Abstract
It has often been argued that the spectacular cognitive capacities of humans are the result of selection for the ability to gather, process, and use information about other people. Recent studies show that humans strongly and consistently differ in what type of social information they are interested in. Although some individuals mainly attend to what the majority is doing (frequency-based learning), others focus on the success that their peers achieve with their behavior (success-based learning). Here, we show that such differences in social learning have important consequences for the outcome of social interactions. We report on a decision-making experiment in which individuals were first classified as frequency- and success-based learners and subsequently grouped according to their learning strategy. When confronted with a social dilemma situation, groups of frequency-based learners cooperated considerably more than groups of success-based learners. A detailed analysis of the decision-making process reveals that these differences in cooperation are a direct result of the differences in information use. Our results show that individual differences in social learning strategies are crucial for understanding social behavior.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference57 articles.
1. The social brain hypothesis;Dunbar;Curr Anthropol,1998
2. Evolution in the Social Brain
3. A bias for social information in human cultural transmission
4. Byrne RW Whiten A , eds (1988) Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans (Clarendon, Oxford)
5. Whiten A Byrne RW , eds (1997) Machiavellian Intelligence II: Extensions and Evaluations (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK)
Cited by
49 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献