Joint control of terrestrial gross primary productivity by plant phenology and physiology

Author:

Xia Jianyang,Niu Shuli,Ciais Philippe,Janssens Ivan A.,Chen Jiquan,Ammann Christof,Arain Altaf,Blanken Peter D.,Cescatti Alessandro,Bonal Damien,Buchmann Nina,Curtis Peter S.,Chen Shiping,Dong Jinwei,Flanagan Lawrence B.,Frankenberg Christian,Georgiadis Teodoro,Gough Christopher M.,Hui Dafeng,Kiely Gerard,Li Jianwei,Lund Magnus,Magliulo Vincenzo,Marcolla Barbara,Merbold Lutz,Montagnani LeonardoORCID,Moors Eddy J.ORCID,Olesen Jørgen E.,Piao Shilong,Raschi Antonio,Roupsard Olivier,Suyker Andrew E.,Urbaniak MarekORCID,Vaccari Francesco P.,Varlagin Andrej,Vesala Timo,Wilkinson Matthew,Weng Ensheng,Wohlfahrt GeorgORCID,Yan Liming,Luo Yiqi

Abstract

Terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP) varies greatly over time and space. A better understanding of this variability is necessary for more accurate predictions of the future climate–carbon cycle feedback. Recent studies have suggested that variability in GPP is driven by a broad range of biotic and abiotic factors operating mainly through changes in vegetation phenology and physiological processes. However, it is still unclear how plant phenology and physiology can be integrated to explain the spatiotemporal variability of terrestrial GPP. Based on analyses of eddy–covariance and satellite-derived data, we decomposed annual terrestrial GPP into the length of the CO2 uptake period (CUP) and the seasonal maximal capacity of CO2 uptake (GPPmax). The product of CUP and GPPmax explained >90% of the temporal GPP variability in most areas of North America during 2000–2010 and the spatial GPP variation among globally distributed eddy flux tower sites. It also explained GPP response to the European heatwave in 2003 (r2 = 0.90) and GPP recovery after a fire disturbance in South Dakota (r2 = 0.88). Additional analysis of the eddy–covariance flux data shows that the interbiome variation in annual GPP is better explained by that in GPPmax than CUP. These findings indicate that terrestrial GPP is jointly controlled by ecosystem-level plant phenology and photosynthetic capacity, and greater understanding of GPPmax and CUP responses to environmental and biological variations will, thus, improve predictions of GPP over time and space.

Funder

US Department of Energy

National Science Foundataion

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference55 articles.

1. Enhanced Seasonal Exchange of CO 2 by Northern Ecosystems Since 1960

2. Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological observations;Jung;J Geophys Res Biogeosci,2012

3. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species

4. Coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model for leaves of C4 plants;Collatz;Funct Plant Biol,1992

5. Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3