Abstract
How universal is human conceptual structure? The way concepts are organized in the human brain may reflect distinct features of cultural, historical, and environmental background in addition to properties universal to human cognition. Semantics, or meaning expressed through language, provides indirect access to the underlying conceptual structure, but meaning is notoriously difficult to measure, let alone parameterize. Here, we provide an empirical measure of semantic proximity between concepts using cross-linguistic dictionaries to translate words to and from languages carefully selected to be representative of worldwide diversity. These translations reveal cases where a particular language uses a single “polysemous” word to express multiple concepts that another language represents using distinct words. We use the frequency of such polysemies linking two concepts as a measure of their semantic proximity and represent the pattern of these linkages by a weighted network. This network is highly structured: Certain concepts are far more prone to polysemy than others, and naturally interpretable clusters of closely related concepts emerge. Statistical analysis of the polysemies observed in a subset of the basic vocabulary shows that these structural properties are consistent across different language groups, and largely independent of geography, environment, and the presence or absence of a literary tradition. The methods developed here can be applied to any semantic domain to reveal the extent to which its conceptual structure is, similarly, a universal attribute of human cognition and language use.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference53 articles.
1. Whorf BL (1956) Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
2. Fodor JA (1975) The Language of Thought (Harvard Univ Press, New York)
3. Wierzbicka A (1996) Semantics: Primes and Universals (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, UK)
4. Lucy JA (1992) Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK)
5. Levinson SC (2003) Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK)
Cited by
71 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献