Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans’ support for partisan violence

Author:

Mernyk Joseph S.1,Pink Sophia L.1,Druckman James N.23ORCID,Willer Robb1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305

2. Department of Political Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208

3. Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208

Abstract

Significance Prominent events, such as the 2021 US Capitol attack, have brought politically motivated violence to the forefront of Americans’ minds. Yet, the causes of support for partisan violence remain poorly understood. Across four studies, we found evidence that exaggerated perceptions of rival partisans’ support for violence are a major cause of partisans’ own support for partisan violence. Further, correcting these false beliefs reduces partisans’ support for and willingness to engage in violence, especially among those with the largest misperceptions, and this effect endured for 1 mo. These findings suggest that a simple correction of partisans’ misperceptions could be a practical and scalable way to durably reduce Americans’ support for, and intentions to engage in, partisan violence.

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference38 articles.

1. L. Diamond L. Drutman T. Lindberg N. P. Kalmoe L. Mason Americans increasingly believe violence is justified if the other side wins. Politico Magazine 1 October 2020. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/10/01/political-violence-424157. Accessed 28 January 2022.

2. Pew Research Center How do the political parties make you feel? (2016). https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/06/22/6-how-do-the-political-parties-make-you-feel/. Accessed 28 January 2022.

3. Georgetown University Institute of Politics and Public Service New poll: Voters find political divisions so bad believe U.S. is two-thirds of the way to “edge of civil war” (2019). https://politics.georgetown.edu/2019/10/23/new-poll-voters-find-political-divisions-so-bad-believe-u-s-is-two-thirds-of-the-way-to-edge-of-a-civil-war/. Accessed 28 January 2022.

4. K. Arceneaux R. Truex Donald Trump and the lie. PsyArXiv [Preprint] (2021). https://psyarxiv.com/e89ym (Accessed 28 January 2022).

5. N. Kalmoe L. Mason “Lethal mass partisanship: Prevalence correlates & electoral contingencies” in National Capital Area Political Science Association American Politics Meeting (2019). https://www.dannyhayes.org/uploads/6/9/8/5/69858539/kalmoe_mason_ncapsa_2019_lethal_partisanship_final_lmedit.pdf. Accessed 28 January 2022.

Cited by 53 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3