On the role of parameterization in models with a misspecified nuisance component

Author:

Battey Heather S.1,Reid Nancy2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mathematics, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

2. Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada

Abstract

The paper is concerned with inference for a parameter of interest in models that share a common interpretation for that parameter but that may differ appreciably in other respects. We study the general structure of models under which the maximum likelihood estimator of the parameter of interest is consistent under arbitrary misspecification of the nuisance part of the model. A specialization of the general results to matched-comparison and two-groups problems gives a more explicit and easily checkable condition in terms of a notion of symmetric parameterization, leading to a broadening and unification of existing results in those problems. The role of a generalized definition of parameter orthogonality is highlighted, as well as connections to Neyman orthogonality. The issues involved in obtaining inferential guarantees beyond consistency are briefly discussed.

Funder

Canadian Government | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

UKRI | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Reference27 articles.

1. Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author)

2. Comment on Breiman’s “Statistical modeling: The two cultures’’;Cox D. R.;Stat. Sci.,2001

3. D. R. Cox, “Tests of separate families of hypotheses” in Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium, J. Neyman, Ed. (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1961), vol. I, pp. 105–123.

4. P. J. Huber, “The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions” in Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium, L. M. Le Cam, J. Neyman, Eds. (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1967), vol. I, pp. 221–233.

5. Robust properties of likelihood ratio tests;Kent J.;Biometrika,1982

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3